Skip to main content

What is Man's Basic Nature? Ontological Question #4

Thought:

This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.

Romans 3:22-24

The fourth ontological question is "What is man's basic nature?" I remember my professor introducing this question and wondering how it could give us problems. What does it matter what we believe about our basic makeup? Yet, I have noticed that we, as a country, spend enormous amounts of money addressing this issue. I see our school systems using educational models trying to fix this problem. The way in which we answer this question affects how we make sense of mankind and its struggle. Our belief shapes the solutions we propose to fix social issues. This is a very important ontological question.

Here are some assessment questions to help each of us determine what we believe about man's basic nature. Are some people by nature good and others bad? What makes a man good or bad, genetics? Parenting? Or societal pressures? Is man redeemable? If so, how? Is man by design different than animals and plants ? Or, is all life equally sacred?

Since the twentieth century Western culture has adopted a humanistic view of man's fundamental makeup. We generally accept that each individual is basically good and needs a healthy, supportive environment to achieve his or her personal potential. We see criminal behavior as an outcome of poverty, racism, or a dysfunctional family structure. As a result of this assumption, we try to re-habilitate criminals, hoping that earlier developmental failures can be overcome and new learning can occur. We have developed governmental and educational programs to address weaknesses in our current social support systems, such as daycare programs for teenage mothers trying to finish high school, school breakfasts and lunches for impoverished inner city children, and halfway houses for parolees. Many of these programs assume that if each recipient is encouraged, championed, and loved enough that they will leave the system a stronger individual, capable of better choices.

These programs are wonderful and I have been involved with several over the course of my career, but as a Christian, I believe the underlying ontological assumption is wrong. The Old Testament records that while we were created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26) we all are like sheep who have gone astray, each of us turning to our own ways (paraphrase of Isaiah 53:7). Paul's instruction to the church in Rome tells us that our only hope for a righteous life is found in our faith and belief in Jesus. Answering this ontological question biblically helps us to make sense of the world's injustices (humanity is sinful and in need of God)and directs us to look to Jesus as the solution to our problems. As a result of this belief, we are not surprised when others disappoint us and do not put our hopes in any government agenda or social program to solve our problems. We understand that every institutional solution has one major flaw, humanity. There is a answer to our dilemma and it is Christ's redemption, freely offered to every person.

Next week is the last ontological question, Where do we go when we die?

Comments

  1. Good thoughts here. Helped me see something clearer.I do believe not unlike St. Patrick and at least the outcome of him taking the good news of Christ to Ireland, that we have to go creation, fall, covenant, redemption and new creation. People need to see what they are by creation and what that involves, as we see in the early chapters of Genesis.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ...as well as their lostness (from that, as well as all that involves).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Narcissism: Understanding the Effects of Narcissistic Parenting

Since Freud, researchers have studied various environmental effects on maturing personalities, and it has been well documented that parenting styles are profoundly involved in the shaping of children’s developing psyches. It is hard enough working with a narcissistic boss or living with a narcissistic spouse, but being raised by narcissistic parents has several serious emotional consequences. What are some of these effects? Dr. Paul Meier in his book, You Might Be a Narcissist If . . . How to Identify Narcissism in Ourselves and Others and what We Can Do About It , identifies four consequences of narcissistic parenting. They are: 1) the  development of a false self; 2) the desire to behave with perfectionism; 3) chronic habits of passivity; and 4) increased vulnerability to addictive behaviors. The Development of a False Self Since narcissistic parents unconsciously need others to help soothe their fragile sense of self, they naturally turn to any available relationships

Patsies, Pawns, Patrons, and Police: Understanding Sociopathic Relationship Roles

At least one time in our lives each of us will make the mistake of trusting someone who doesn’t deserve it.  Especially when we consider the statistics that one out of every twenty-five people in the world are individuals with APD (sociopaths). In the best-case scenario, this betrayal only inconvenienced us, but more often we will have been conned, cheated, or abused. How do we recognize and avoid relationships with sociopaths? To protect ourselves, it is important to understand sociopaths’ motivation for developing relationships. Their reasons are not the same as ours! Lacking a conscience, they are unable to form emotional attachments and are disinterested in developing a bond with others.  Instead, they are thrill seekers, and use relationships to achieve this goal. In pursuit of their next big emotional charge, sociopaths tend to cast others into three main roles: “pawns, patrons, or police.” “Pawns” are individuals with little or no social or political power who

Antisocial Personality Disorder Resource List

This is the final article in the series looking at Antisocial Personality Disorder. I plan to start a new series discussing various aspects of Depression in January 2013. Hope everyone has a wonderful, happy holiday season! Resource List Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths go to Work by Paul Babiak, PhD & Robert D. Hare, PhD (2006) HarperCollins Publishers Not all individuals with Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD) are in prison, many are among us. They work and play alongside us. Babiak and Hare reveal the common ploys of psychopaths, especially in the corporate world. The authors provide detailed suggestions about how to screen for psychopaths in the interview process as well as how to protect the work environment from those whose main goals are to manipulate and exploit the workplace. This is an outstanding book for those in the business world who would like to become more aware of the subtle warning signs of psychopaths.   The Sociopath Next D